Abalone Monitoring

Abalone Monitoring

Abalone Monitoring

Methods

Site Selection & Survey Frequency

  1. To achieve adequate representation of within-aggregation population structure at different locations and habitats, we randomly selected six sites:
    • classified suitable abalone habitat using NOAA ShoreZone Database
    • randomly selected 21 sites from 3 stratified regions
    • timed swim abalone counts starting from the 21 starting points were used to choose 6 sites with varying densities of abalone
    • surveyed these sites bi-annually to assess seasonal variability
  2. To ensure inclusion of high density, ‘easy-access’ sites for more frequent sampling, we non-randomly selected two sites:
    • density and aggregation data compiled from volunteer surveys and personal use information in inner Sitka Sound
    • non-random selection of two high-density sites for frequent survey
    • bi-weekly surveys of these sites to characterize short-term variability

Site Layout

Two 30 x 2 m transects at each site, established at the optimal depth zones for abalone: around -3 and -6 meters.

Two Abalone Recruitment Modules (ARMs) were placed between transects, around -4 and -9 meters. These ARMs have been used in other studies as an artificial habitat that has been shown to be successful in attracting abalone recruits.

For a full description of methods and approach, see the Sitka Sound Abalone Monitoring Plan authored by project leads in partial fulfillment of this study.

Sitesetup
Schematic of standard site set up
Studyarea_waveexposure
fullscreen
Map of 21 randomly chosen sites (7 per geographic stratum) for potential selection as permanent study sites. Sites ultimately selected are not shown for confidentiality reasons
caption
Taylor White surveying along a permanent transect for pinto abalone